I'll definitely be looking out for Howarth's other books. He wrote: 'Nobody has reported to us in detail the short harangue with which on this occasion the Duke increased the courage of his troops.' - and he went straight on to quote the speech at great length word for word.' Get the best deal by comparing prices from over. 'Obviously, nobody could really make a speech to an army, and the chaplain rather gave the game away. David Howarths 1066: The Year of the Conquest is intended for the general reader, but is also of interest to scholars who are already familiar with the. You might not agree with his point of view, but it sure is fun to listen to. ' was a more barbarous primitive man than either Edward or Harold, but he is not to be blamed: he came from a more barbarous primitive country.'īut it is this point of view, and this conversational tone that makes this book so enjoyable. He infuses the book with his own point of view, which at times can be borderline Francophobic. Howarth uses mostly contemporaneous writings (17 of his 20 sources are within 100 years of the Battle of Hastings) to decipher and tell the history of the battle between King Harold of England and William the Conqueror of Normandy. It is a great storyteller's version of events as he understands them. The year 1066 was a year of great significance in English history.

This is not a comprehensive history of the Battle of Hastings, and it is not meant to be. What are David Howarth’s main arguments in 1066 the Year of Conquest What factors led to defeat of the Anglo-Saxons by the Normans What were the effects of the Norman conquest of England upon Anglo-Saxon society Expert Answer 1.

1066 by david howarth